It was this newly minted Muse Group that purchased Audacity and triggered the controversy. ![]() Just what happened?Īfter the Muse Group bought Audacity, they began to quickly stir up controversy. First, they added telemetry, that is, the ability for the program to send back user data to the Muse Group. Google uses telemetry to make sure programs like Chrome work, as well as to refine your searches on their engine in attempt to get you more relevant results. Telemetry, in short, is product feedback. Never mind the ulterior purposes that Google may have, scores of other companies collect data and sell it off to marketing companies and others (a practice, I might add, that Smartsound will NEVER do). The user community is naturally and rightfully fed up with companies offering a (usually free) service and selling their data off to the highest bidder. ![]() That is, in part, the unfortunate reality behind free services. The company has to make money one way or another, whether that’s through bloatware or shadier practices. So naturally they’re paranoid and skeptical. They also updated their Contributor License Agreement, which developers have to sign if they choose to work on the Audacity code. ![]() #Open source audacity audio editor not license# Who does Audacity share your Personal Data with? Audacity’s new privacy policyįinally, to muddy the issue further, they updated their privacy policy: It reads that the Muse Group gets all rights to the written code, which is decidedly against the previous open source spirt of the program. #Open source audacity audio editor not license#.#Open source audacity audio editor not software#.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |